{"id":1471,"date":"2023-02-01T02:42:45","date_gmt":"2023-01-31T19:42:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi?p=1471"},"modified":"2023-02-02T11:02:42","modified_gmt":"2023-02-02T04:02:42","slug":"enforcement-introduction-to-vietnam-trademark-law-and-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/en\/enforcement-introduction-to-vietnam-trademark-law-and-practice\/","title":{"rendered":"Introduction to Vietnam Trademark Law and Practice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This material is only intended to provide an introduction to and simplified profile of an area of this jurisdiction&#8217;s trademark law and practice and has primarily been prepared for practitioners considering the merits of filing an opposition in this jurisdiction. This material does not take the place of professional advice given with full knowledge of the specific circumstances of each case and proficiency in the laws of this jurisdiction such as might be provided by a local trademark attorney.<\/p>\n<p>CONTRIBUTOR: TUYEN Tran Nguyen Tran, ELITE Law Firm, Thanh Xu\u00e2n, Vietnam<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: David Allison, Bird &amp; Bird, Hong Kong SAR, China<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: Odette Gourley, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Sydney, Australia<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: Christoph Kleiner, Kleiner Rechtsanwalte, Stuttgart, Germany<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: Allan Poulter, Bird &amp; Bird, London, United Kingdom<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: Fernando Triana, Triana, Uribe &amp; Michelsen, Bogot\u00e1, Colombia<br \/>\nPRINCIPAL EDITOR: Rick Young, Quarles &amp; Brady, Chicago, United States<\/p>\n<h3><strong><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">I. PRE-FILING REQUIREMENTS\/DEMAND LETTERS<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n<p>Although it is not mandatory to send a demand letter before instituting proceedings in this jurisdiction, it is common to send such a letter. Sending a demand letter (cease and desist letter) to an infringer before taking a raid under administrative measures or bringing the case before a court under civil measures in Vietnam is quite dependent<br \/>\non the opinion\/decision of the IP owners. Typically, for cases with relatively low amounts of damages caused by infringement and in cases where the infringement is not clear and obvious, the rights owner will wish to send a letter to the infringer before taking further legal action.<\/p>\n<p>Before initiating an infringement proceeding, a party may take the following actions: It is advisable, but not required, that the IP owner obtain an assessment conclusion from the Vietnam Intellectual Property Research Institute (VIPRI) confirming the IP infringement of the infringer over the IP owner being protected in Vietnam. It is also advisable to verify that the infringer does not have any IP rights as to the goods\/services containing IP infringement element(s).<\/p>\n<p>Such a letter should be sent at the following time:<br \/>\n&#8211; after obtaining (i) evidence of trademark infringement and (ii) an assessment<br \/>\nconclusion from the Vietnam Intellectual Property Research Institute (VIPRI)<br \/>\nconfirming the infringement; or<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; after obtaining evidence of trademark infringement.<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">II. CLAIM FOR INFRINGEMENT OF A REGISTERED TRADEMARK<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>There is more than one court system or administrative body that has jurisdiction over claims for infringement of a registered trademark (see below). Besides civil courts, the Market Management Authorities and the Inspectorate of Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam have the right to handle trademark infringement activities in Vietnam. The Information and Communications Inspectors of the Ministry of Information and Communications have the right to handle domain names that infringe registered trademarks.<\/p>\n<p>\nThe court system or administrative body that most frequently hears claims for infringement of a registered trademark is: Administrative and civil proceedings are both possible. For administrative measures, the Market Management Authorities and the Science and Technology Inspectors of the Ministry of Science and Technology; for civil proceedings, the Civil Courts under People&#8217;s Courts at the provincial level. More than 90 percent of IP infringement cases in Vietnam are handled by administrative procedures. The Market Management Authorities at the provincial level (of 63 provinces and cities of Vietnam) are the administrative bodies that handle more than 90 percent of trademark infringement cases under administrative procedures.<\/p>\n<p>\nThe other court system or administrative body that can also hear claims for infringement of a registered trademark is: besides civil courts, the Market Management Authorities and the Inspectorate of Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam have the right to handle trademark infringement activities in Vietnam. The Information<br \/>\nand Communications Inspectors of the Ministry of Information and Communications have the right to handle domain names that infringe registered trademarks.\u00a0<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">III. CLAIM FOR INFRINGEMENT OF AN UNREGISTERED TRADEMARK\/UNFAIR <\/span><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">COMPETITION\/PASSING OFF<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Unregistered trademarks are not protected in this jurisdiction<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">IV. CIVIL ENFORCEMENT&#8211; EMERGENCY MEASURES<\/span><\/h3>\n<h4>A. Ex Parte Injunctions<\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Ex parte injunctions are available to claimants seeking emergency relief.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">In order to apply for an ex parte injunction, it is necessary to institute infringement proceedings at the same time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>There is no specified statutory or court-determined deadline for seeking an ex parte<br \/>\ninjunction. During the pendency of the litigation or at the time of instituting the proceedings, the plaintiff has the right to seek an ex parte injunction<\/p>\n<h4>B. Interim Inter Partes Injunctions<\/h4>\n<p>Interim inter partes injunctions are available to claimants seeking emergency relief. In order to apply for an interim inter parties injunction, it is necessary to institute infringement proceedings at the same time.<\/p>\n<p>There is no specified deadline for seeking an interim inter partes injunction. During<br \/>\nthe time of handling of the case or at the time the proceedings are instituted, the<br \/>\nplaintiff has the right to seek an ex parte injunction\/interim inter partes injunction<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">V. EARLY RESOLUTION OF LITIGATION<\/span><\/h3>\n<h4>A. Interim Applications Available for Ending Proceedings Early<\/h4>\n<p>A party can seek to end proceedings prior to trial or final determination by interim applications for:<br \/>\n&#8211; summary judgment (judgment as a matter of law when facts are undisputed);<br \/>\n&#8211; determination of preliminary issue by trial or hearing;<br \/>\n&#8211; striking out or dismissing a party\u2019s case on the pleadings.<\/p>\n<h4>B. Summary Judgment<\/h4>\n<p>A party can conclude proceedings early by obtaining summary judgment in the following circumstances:<br \/>\n&#8211; there are no material factual disputes;<br \/>\n&#8211; there is no arguable case or defense (i.e., there is no reasonable prospect of the party&#8217;s succeeding in the proceedings).<\/p>\n<h4>C. Trial of Preliminary Issue<\/h4>\n<p>Proceedings cannot be expedited through an early trial or hearing on a preliminary issue. With the exception of an agreed settlement, there are no procedures to expedite a matter to an early trial. However, in very simple and straightforward cases, it may be possible to apply for a shortened summary procedure (under Article 317.1 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, effective as of July 1, 2016).<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">VI. EVIDENCE<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>A claimant must present or give notice of any evidence upon which it will rely at a time set by the tribunal. Under Articles 96.1 and 96.4 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, the parties (plaintiff and\/or defendant and\/or person who has related interests and obligation) have the right and obligation to submit documents and evidence to the<br \/>\ncourt. The time limit for submission of documents and evidence is fixed by the assigned judge, but it shall not exceed the period of preparation for the trial of first instance procedures and time limit for the preparation of a civil settlement under the provisions of the Code.<\/p>\n<p>\nA defendant must present or give notice of any evidence upon which it will rely at a time set by the tribunal. Under Articles 96.1 and 96.4 of the Civil Procedure Code 2015, the parties (plaintiff and\/or defendant and\/or person who has related interests and obligation) have the right and obligation to submit documents and evidence to the<br \/>\ncourt. The time limit for submission of documents and evidence is fixed by the assigned judge, but it shall not exceed the period of preparation for the trial of first instance procedures and time limit for the preparation of a civil settlement under the provisions of the Code.<\/p>\n<p>A party to the proceedings may obtain information that is within the possession or control of another party to the proceedings: at the request of the tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>Next parts of the introduction will provide a general guide to:<\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">VII. TRIAL\/ORAL HEARING<\/span><\/h3>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">VIII. JUDGMENT\/FINAL ORDERS<\/span><\/h3>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">IX. POST-JUDGMENT MATTERS<\/span><\/h3>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">X. COSTS OF LITIGATION<\/span><\/h3>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #891d1f;\">XI. REMEDIES<\/span><\/h3>\n<p>For details information, please <span style=\"color: #000080;\"><a style=\"color: #000080;\" href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1XwcSKOY8kOzHsdtvZbMM6KTTmbr7MNhf\/view?usp=sharing\"><strong>click here<\/strong><\/a> <\/span>for full version.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #f58731;\"><strong>RESOLVING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS DISPUTES QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #f58731;\"><strong>PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS SECURELY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #f58731;\"><strong>FOR DOING BUSINESS STRONGLY, DEVELOPING SUCCESSFULLY<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><b><i><span lang=\"EN-US\">ELITE LAW FIRM<\/span><\/i><\/b><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u00a0\u2013 255 Hoang Van Thai Str., Thanh Xuan Dist., Hanoi, Vietnam<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><b><span lang=\"EN-US\">Tel:<\/span><\/b><span lang=\"EN-US\">\u00a00243 7373 051 |\u00a0<b>Hotline\/Whatapps<\/b>: 0988 746 527 | Email:\u00a0<a href=\"mailto:info@lawfirmelite.com\/vi\">info@lawfirmelite.com\/vi<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What should I do if my trademark is infringed? What step can I take to protect my industrial property right? The following article will provide an introduction to and simplified profile of an area of this jurisdiction&#8217;s trademark law and practice.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6742,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[48,1837],"tags":[1841,1843,1845,412,461,589,613,655,727,1573,1785,1831],"class_list":["post-1471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-notable-articles","tag-patent-attorney","tag-trademark-law","tag-introduction","tag-elite-law-firm-en","tag-elite-en","tag-inta-en","tag-ip-law","tag-trademark","tag-the-internation-trademark-association","tag-ip-enforcement","tag-vietnam-ip-law","tag-elite-lf","cat-48-id","cat-1837-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1471"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1471"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6743,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1471\/revisions\/6743"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lawfirmelite.com\/vi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}